faulker013

Respondents (Obama & the other Defendants) Waive the Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit There is new activity on the U.S. Supreme Court Docket today with an effective date on the docket of 3 Nov 2010. http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm 1. The Respondents named in our Petition have waived their right to respond. 2. The Western Center for Journalism has filed a motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of our petition. To read the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed on 30 Sep 2010 see this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress For More Information contact: Mario Apuzzo, Esq., Jamesburg, New Jersey http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ Tel: 732-521-1900, Fax: 732-521-3906 Email: apuzzo@erols.com More information will be posted as we receive it. Updat...

Of Trees and Plants and Basic Logic: Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Likewise, "natural born Citizens" are "Citizens at Birth" but not all "Citizens at Birth" are "natural born Citizens"! Citizen at Birth (CAB) does NOT identically equal Natural Born Citizen (NBC) at Birth . Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the USA. by: Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired) http://www.protectourliberty.org While a natural born Citizen is obviously a Citizen at birth, not all Citizens at birth are natural born Citizens at birth. The two legal terms of art are not identical and are not equal. All "natural born Citizens" are Citizens at birth but not all Citizens at Birth are "natural born Citizens" at birth . If you cannot grasp that logic concept then try this analogy, "all trees are plants but not all plants are trees". There are five types of Citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. All...

Click to Learn What Congress is Hiding and the Truth About Natural Born Citizenship Members of Congress Internal Memorandum -- What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo Revealed. This was the spin that the Members of Congress were given to keep the American electorate at bay and confused in the debate about Obama's eligibility issues all the while the Congress did nothing to investigate the matter in a congressional hearing like they did for similar concerns about John McCain. We have obtained a copy of the talking points memorandum put out by a lawyer for the Congressional Research Service to the Members of Congress back in April 2009 as to what to tell their constituents when they write to the Members of Congress and ask questions about Obama's eligibility. Now we know why all the answers coming back to constituents sounded like they were written by the same person and were full of the same obfuscations, omit...

The Framers Used Emer de Vattel, Not William Blackstone to Define a “Natural Born Citizen” by: Mario Apuzzo, Esq. The question which has gripped our nation is whether Barack Obama is eligible to be President and Commander in Chief. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 provides that: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” The proper question under this clause is not whether Obama is a “Citizen of the United States.” Rather, the correct question is whether Obama is a “ natural born Citizen ” thereunder. "It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect, and therefore such construction is inadmissible unless the words require it….” Marbury v. M...

Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 25, 18, and 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446 . Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010. [Update 13 Oct 2010: Kerchner v Obama - Supreme Court Activity ] Obama is not Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military . Obama is NOT a " natural born Citizen " to constitutional standards. Obama's father was NOT a U.S. Citizen . Obama's father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama's father was a foreign national, a British Subject . Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama...

A Sampling of Some Quotes about the U.S. Constitution from History Quotes Source: http://www.constitution.org/cons/const_quotes.htm The following is a sampling of some quotes from history which make some very important points about the principles of constitutional republican government: 1. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary, as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction, and no excuse for interpolation or addition. — Martin v . Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat 304; Gibbons v . Ogden, 9 Wheat 419; Brown v . Maryland, 12 Wheat 419; Craig v . Missouri, 4 Pet 10; Tennessee v . Whitworth, 117 U.S. 139; Lake County v . Rollins, 130 U.S. 662; Hodges v . United States, 203 U.S. 1; Edwards v . Cuba R. Co., 268 U.S. 628; The Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655; (Justice) Story on the Constitution, 5th ed., Sec 451; Cooley's Constitutional Limitations, 2n...

Absolute proof the Founders knew and accepted Vattel`s French "naturels" to mean "natural born" by: Teo the Bear @ http://www.thebirthers.org Found in the Library of Congress Website If you look at Article III in the body of the text below, you will see, Les consuls et vice consuls respectifs ne pourront être pris que parmi les sujets naturels de la puissance qui les nommera. Tous seront appointés par leur souverain respectif, et ils ne pourront en conséquence faire aucun trafic ou commerce quelconque ni pour leur propre compte, ni pour le compte d'autrui. Going down further to the end you will find under number 3, The respective Consuls and Vice Consuls shall only be taken from among the natural born subjects of the power nominating them. They shall all be appointed by their respective Sovereign, and in Consequence of such appointment they shall not exercise any traffic or commerce whatsoever either on their own account, or on account of any other T...